Here’s a bold statement: In the high-stakes world of Formula 1, where every millisecond counts, Lando Norris has just flipped the script. By cutting his reliance on data, he’s not only reclaimed the top spot in the standings but also sparked a debate about the role of technology in racing. Just one point ahead of his teammate Oscar Piastri, Norris’s recent success in Mexico has everyone talking—and for good reason. But here’s where it gets controversial: could less data actually lead to better performance? Let’s dive in.
Norris’s resurgence at the top of the Formula 1 leaderboard comes on the heels of his victory in Mexico, where he outpaced Piastri by a slim margin. This achievement wasn’t just about raw speed; it was about consistency, strategy, and a surprising decision to simplify his approach. Specifically, Norris chose to remove the delta time indicator from his steering wheel display—a move that might seem counterintuitive in a sport obsessed with data. This small change, however, has had a big impact, potentially giving him the edge over his teammate.
And this is the part most people miss: The delta time, displayed in the upper right corner of the McLaren steering wheel, is a tool many drivers rely on to gauge their lap progress. It shows, turn by turn, whether they’re improving or falling behind their best time. But Norris decided to ditch it, believing it was distracting him from focusing on the present moment. Instead of reacting to data, he wanted to trust his instincts and maximize every corner—a risky move that paid off spectacularly in Mexico, where he secured pole position compared to his fifth-place qualifying in Singapore.
Meanwhile, Piastri, who still uses the delta time, qualified third in Singapore but slipped to eighth in Mexico. This contrast highlights a fundamental difference in their approaches: Norris prioritizes feel and intuition, while Piastri leans on data for precision. But which method is truly superior? That’s a question that’s dividing fans and experts alike.
Norris’s decision to eliminate the delta time wasn’t arbitrary. He explained that without it, he feels freer to push harder, regardless of how the lap starts. “Who knows if [the delta] would have helped me or made me worse?” he said after the Mexico GP. “When I don’t have it, I push no matter what—no matter how any corner was.” This mindset shift has allowed him to focus entirely on the track, rather than fixating on numbers. As he put it, “It’s a pleasant surprise to see the lap time pop up when it’s as good as this one.”
But let’s not forget: Norris isn’t completely data-blind. Key metrics like tire temperature, gear settings, and brake balance remain visible on his steering wheel. These are essential for optimizing performance, especially during races, where the delta time returns to his display. In races, the delta serves as a reference for consistency and fuel-saving strategies, making it a valuable tool in a different context.
Here’s the controversial question: Is Formula 1 becoming too reliant on data, at the expense of driver intuition? Norris’s success suggests that sometimes, less is more. But what do you think? Is his approach a game-changer, or just a risky gamble? Let us know in the comments—this debate is far from over.
For more insights into Norris’s dominance in Mexico, check out McLaren’s analysis here. And don’t miss the story behind his bold car setup choice here.
We want your opinion! What would you like to see on Motorsport.com? Take our 5-minute survey and help shape the future of racing coverage. – The Motorsport.com Team
